2.10. Statutory Determinations


  1. Protection of Human Health and the Environment
  2. Compliance with ARARs
  3. Cost-Effectiveness
  4. Utilization of Permanent Solutions and Alternative Treatment Technologies to the Maximum Extent Practicable
  5. Preference for Treatment as a Principal Element

Section 121 of CERCLA specifies that the selected remedial actions must comply with all Federal and State ARARs, be cost-effective, be protective of human health and the environment, and utilize permanent solutions and alternative treatment technologies or resource recovery technologies to the maximum extent practicable. In addition, the selected remedies should employ treatment that permanently and significantly reduces the volume, toxicity, or mobility of hazardous wastes as their principal element. The selected remedies for ground water and the unsaturated zone are the same as those described in the PRAP and meet these statutory requirements as discussed below.


2.10.1. Protection of Human Health and the Environment

The selected remedy for ground water will provide adequate protection of human health and the environment through extraction of contaminated ground water and treatment at the surface to reduce in situ concentrations below MCLs. Discharges to the air will be designed for no measurable contaminant emissions. In addition, further offsite migration of the contaminant plume will be prevented. The selected remedy will reduce exposure to levels within or below EPA's acceptable carcinogenic risk range of 10-4 to 10-7, and hazard indices will be far below 1.0 after cleanup.

Vacuum-induced venting of the unsaturated zone will remove subsurface VOCs and FHCs and prevent contaminant migration to ground water. Implementation of the selected remedies will not pose unacceptable short-term risks or impact the adjacent subsurface media, other than some lowering of water levels due to ground water extraction. Lowering of the water table will be mitigated by locally recharging the ground water with treated ground water.


2.10.2. Compliance with ARARs

The selected remedies will comply with all Federal and State ARARs, including the to be considered (TBC) criteria in Appendix B. Table 1 and Table B-1 in Appendix B list and describe the ARARs and TBCs that will be attained by each selected remedy.


2.10.3. Cost-Effectiveness

The selected remedies provide overall effectiveness proportionate to their costs. Present worth cost estimates for each alternative are presented in Tables 5 and 6. Although the selected remedies cost somewhat more in terms of present worth compared to the other alternatives, they enable more rapid cleanup.


2.10.4. Utilization of Permanent Solutions and Alternative Treatment Technologies to the Maximum Extent Practicable

The selected remedies utilize permanent solutions and alternative treatment technologies to the maximum extent practicable. The selected alternatives permanently remove contaminants from ground water and the unsaturated zone by extraction and treatment at the surface using UV/oxidation, air stripping, GAC, and ion exchange for ground water and catalytic oxidation for vapor. Both selected alternatives provide the best balance of tradeoffs among the alternatives, and use treatment technologies that destroy most contaminants, converting them to harmless compounds.

The selected alternatives will reduce contaminant mobility more than the other alternatives. Although the selected alternatives have a higher present worth cost than the other alternatives, the selected alternatives will accomplish the cleanup objectives in a shorter time period. Therefore, reducing contaminant mobility and expediting cleanup time (short-term effectiveness) were the most important primary balancing criteria in selecting the remedies.

For both selected alternatives, overall protection of human health and the environment and the compliance with ARARs were also decisive factors in remedy selection. Community concerns were included in the decision-making process by addressing community input received at CWG meetings and during the public comment period on the PRAP. The Responsiveness Summary, attached to this ROD, addresses community comments on the remedial alternatives.


2.10.5. Preference for Treatment as a Principal Element

The selected remedial actions satisfy the statutory preference for selecting remedies in which treatment that permanently and significantly reduces the volume, toxicity or mobility of the contaminants is a principal element. The selected remedial action for ground water uses treatment to address the contaminated ground water, which is the principal medium of concern. UV/oxidation-based technology destroys contaminants leaving residual harmless compounds such as carbon dioxide and water. Both UV/oxidation and air stripping-based technologies will achieve a permanent and significant reduction of the toxicity, mobility, or volume of the contaminants. Similarly, for the unsaturated zone, vacuum-induced venting followed by catalytic oxidation of the extracted vapor will destroy VOCs and FHCs after removal from contaminated soil, thereby also meeting this statutory preference.


Contact Webmaster LLNL Disclaimers Rev. 6/2/97
UCRL-AR-109105

UCRL-MI-127711 | Privacy & Legal Notice return to accessibility menu

October 1, 2007

LLNL Sponsor Logos NNSA Department of Energy Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
7000 East Avenue • Livermore, CA 94550
Operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration